Method and apparatus for providing a dynamic target impact point sweetener

ABSTRACT

An apparatus for providing a dynamic target impact point sweetener may include memory and a processor. The memory may store at least a target library indicating respective target parameters for a plurality of known potential targets. The processor may be configured by stored instructions to generate a composite multi-dimensional representation of a target based on radar data received at the apparatus from other aerial vehicles collecting projections over an area in which the target is located and based on radar data collected by an aerial vehicle in which the apparatus is located, identify the target based on the composite multi-dimensional representation, and generate aimpoint data regarding the target based on an identity of the target. The aimpoint data defining the most vulnerable point on the target.

TECHNOLOGICAL FIELD

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate generally to image dataprocessing for tomographic image reconstruction and, more particularly,to the use of tomographic image reconstruction for improving a missileaimpoint such that the missile impacts the most vulnerable point on thetarget.

BACKGROUND

Missiles of one form or another had been used in combat for centuriesprior to the development of guided missile technology in the World WarII era. Since then numerous technologies were developed in order toguide missiles to their targets. The use of some form of radiation(e.g., laser or radio waves) has been a common element in many of theseguided missiles. However, as advancements in missile guidance haveimproved, target sophistication continues to improve as well. The costand complexity of each missile, although being typically only a fractionof the cost and complexity of most targets, makes it ever moreimperative that each missile that is fired should be as effective aspossible. Accordingly, it becomes increasingly desirable to continue todevelop enhancements in missile guidance systems to further thelikelihood of success when such weapons are employed.

Missiles with increasingly more sophisticated guidance systems have beendeveloped over the years. In fact, more recently missiles have beendeveloped that can communicate with a central node, such as the platformthat launched the missiles, to receive guidance updates in-flight.However, as target sophistication increases, it can be expected thataccess to the links between launched missiles and a remote central nodemay be denied in the future. Thus, it may be desirable to developmissile technologies that improve the ability of missiles to not onlyhit targets, but hit them in the best possible location for strategicimpact.

BRIEF SUMMARY

Some embodiments of the present disclosure relate to the provision of animproved guidance system for use with guided missiles. Some exampleembodiments may be able to provide dynamic determinations to be maderegarding preferred points at which to attack a particular target.Moreover, these determinations may be made on a vehicle (e.g., amissile) that is prosecuting an attack on the target. Accordingly, theremay be no requirement for the vehicle to be able to communicate with acommon platform (e.g., the platform that launched the vehicle) in orderto enable such dynamic determinations.

In one example embodiment, an apparatus for providing a dynamic targetimpact point sweetener is provided. The apparatus may include memory anda processor. The memory may store at least a target library indicatingrespective target parameters for a plurality of known potential targets.The processor may be configured by stored instructions to generate acomposite multi-dimensional representation of a target based on radardata received at the apparatus from other aerial vehicles collectingprojections over an area in which the target is located and based onradar data collected by an aerial vehicle in which the apparatus islocated, identify the target based on the composite multi-dimensionalrepresentation, and generate aimpoint data regarding the target based onan identity of the target. That aimpoint will define the most vulnerablepoint on the target.

In another example embodiment, a system for providing a dynamic targetimpact point sweetener is provided. The system may include a pluralityof aerial vehicles that are each configured to generate radar data basedon projections over an area in which a target is located. One of theplurality of aerial vehicles may be configured to act as a mastervehicle and remaining ones of the plurality of aerial vehicles may beconfigured to act as slave vehicles. The slave vehicles may beconfigured to provide radar data generated by respective ones of theslave vehicles to the master vehicle. The master vehicle may beconfigured to generate a composite multi-dimensional representation ofthe target based on radar data received from the slave vehicles andradar data collected by the master vehicle, identify the target based onthe composite multi-dimensional representation, and generate aimpointdata regarding the target based on an identity of the target. Thataimpoint will define the most vulnerable point on the target.

In another example embodiment, a method for providing a dynamic targetimpact point sweetener is provided. The method may include receiving, ata master aerial vehicle, radar data corresponding to a target from atleast one slave aerial vehicle in communication with the master vehicle,generating a composite multi-dimensional representation of the targetbased on radar data received from the at least one slave aerial vehicleand radar data generated by the master aerial vehicle, identifying thetarget based on the composite multi-dimensional representation, andgenerating aimpoint data regarding the target based on an identity ofthe target. That aimpoint will define the most vulnerable point on thetarget.

The features, functions and advantages that have been discussed can beachieved independently in various embodiments of the present disclosureor may be combined in yet other embodiments, further details of whichcan be seen with reference to the following description and drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)

Having thus described the disclosure in general terms, reference willnow be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarilydrawn to scale, and wherein:

FIG. 1 illustrates a system for providing a dynamic target impact pointsweetener according to an example embodiment;

FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of hardware that may be employed on amaster vehicle or any vehicle that can function as the master vehicleaccording to an example embodiment;

FIG. 3 illustrates various components of a processing unit that may beconfigured according to an example embodiment;

FIG. 4 illustrates a process flow for operation of a master vehicleaccording to an example embodiment; and

FIG. 5 illustrates a process flow for operation of a slave vehicleaccording to an example embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure now will be described more fully hereinafter withreference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not allembodiments are shown. Indeed, this disclosure may be embodied in manydifferent forms and should not be construed as limited to theembodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided sothat this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Likenumbers refer to like elements throughout.

As discussed above, continued efforts are being made to defineenhancements to guided missile technology. As an example, U.S. Pat. No.7,642,953 to Cheng et al., which shares a common assignee with thepresent application, describes the use of three dimensional (3D)tomographic image reconstruction to develop an accurate image of atarget. According to U.S. Pat. No. 7,642,953, the contents of which areincorporated herein by reference, a central node is in communicationwith a plurality of vehicles to collect radar data about an object. Thecentral node, which may be for example, the platform that launched thevehicles, uses radar return data corresponding to the object from eachof the vehicles (e.g., missiles) to generate the 3D image of the object.

Example embodiments contemplate that it may not always be possible, orperhaps even desirable to communicate with the central node. Forexample, the communication environment may be hostile enough to makesharing the radar return data with the central node difficult or evenimpossible. Example embodiments may therefore enable the sharing ofradar return data among the vehicles themselves, without reliance on thecentral node. Moreover, some example embodiments may enable each of thevehicles to have the ability to generate the 3D image using datacollected locally and combined with data provided from other vehicles.Thus, one or more of the vehicles themselves may generate a composite 3Dimage of the object (e.g., target) so that an accurate assessment of thetarget may be confirmed. The one or more vehicles may then share thecomposite 3D image of the object with other vehicles so that, forexample, prosecution of an attack on the object may occur with improvedconfidence in the target's identity.

Some example embodiments may further enable each of the vehicles to havethe ability to act as a master vehicle that actually does the composite3D image generation using data provided from the other vehicles.Although one vehicle may act as the master vehicle, any of the slavesmay take over the role of master, if desired or needed.

In some example embodiments, the composite 3D image may be compared to atarget image library to determine a vulnerable region (or sweet spot) onthe object. For example, the target image library may store data onvarious classes of targets (or specific hull numbers in some instances)that indicates the location of the engine room, the control center,ammunition storage or other vulnerable areas on the object. The mastervehicle may, as an alternative or addition to providing the composite 3Dimage to other vehicles, provide information indicative of the locationof the vulnerable region of the object to the slaves so that thevehicles can each more specifically target the vulnerable region. Assuch, example embodiments of the present invention may enable thevehicles themselves to dynamically employ a target impact pointsweetener to more effectively attack a target, even in the absence ofcommunication with the launching platform or some other remotecontrolling node.

FIG. 1 illustrates a system for creating a three-dimensional (3D) imageof an object according to an example embodiment. The system of FIG. 1illustrates a plurality of vehicles (e.g., vehicles 100, 102 and 104)that may be associated with a launch platform 106 or other central node.The launch platform 106 or central node may be a manned aircraft or evena ship or other ground-based platform. In the example of FIG. 1, thevehicles 100, 102 and 104 are capable of obtaining radar data of anobject (e.g., target object 108) on the surface of the earth 110. Thesurface of the earth could be either ground or water. It should also beappreciated that although three vehicles and one launch platform areshown in FIG. 1, any number of vehicles and launch platforms could beemployed in some embodiments (e.g., including fewer or more vehicles andperhaps more launch platforms).

In an example embodiment, the vehicles 100, 102 and 104 may be anycombination of different types of missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles(UAVs) or aircraft that may be capable of obtaining radar datapertaining to the target object 108. As such, for example, the vehicles100, 102 and 104 may each include hardware (e.g., antennas andcorresponding processing equipment) for projecting beams or cones ofelectromagnetic radiation from corresponding radar systems on each ofthe vehicles 100, 102 and 104 onto the target object 108 and thencollecting the data that returns from those beams or cones. In thisexample, vehicle 100 projects cone 112, vehicle 102 projects cone 114,and vehicle 104 projects cone 116.

In response to these cones being projected, the different vehicles mayeach collect the signals that return from a corresponding one of thecones 112, 114 and 116 to generate respective different partial views ofthe target object 108. Conventional computer assisted tomography that isused for medical purposes to image a part of the body, typically employsa plurality of fixed sensors to receive return data from respectivedifferent angles that correspond to the positioning of the sensors at agiven time. Similarly, example embodiments may provide a system that cangenerate a plurality of different views of the target object 108 basedon the return data received. However, due to movement of the vehicles100, 102 and 104, the projected cones 112, 114 and 116 are in relativelyconstant motion to generate respective different views of the targetobject 108. Thus, the effects of a medical tomographic image may bereproduced with far fewer sensors since the moving sensors provide fordifferent views over time. Each of the vehicles 100, 102 and 104 maycollect its own data that is reflective of the views it has generatedover time while receiving radar data corresponding to the target object108. The radar data may be generated responsive to active transmissionsby one or more of the vehicles 100, 102 and 104 (or even the launchplatform 106). Each of these respective partial images that aregenerated by the vehicles 100, 102 and 104 may then be fed to a singlemaster vehicle (e.g., vehicle 100). The master vehicle, which is one ofthe vehicles instead of being the launch platform 106, may more easilycommunicate with the other vehicles since it is typically closer inproximity to the other vehicles. In an example embodiment, the vehicles100, 102 and 104 may communicate with each other using communicationlinks 118. The master vehicle may then generate a composite 3D image ofthe object based on the radar data received from each of the othervehicles (which may be considered to be slave vehicles).

In an example embodiment, the vehicles 100, 102 and 104 may coordinate(e.g., under control of the master vehicle) to obtain the collection ofcertain views to provide improved image construction. For example, if aparticular aspect or angle of the target object 108 is not accuratelyrepresented based on the image data received (e.g., as determined by themaster vehicle responsive to generation of the 3D composite image), themaster vehicle may identify the missing aspect or angle to one or moreof the slaves and the slaves (and/or the master) may maneuveraccordingly to attempt to obtain a view of the target object 108 thatcorresponds to the missing aspect or angle.

Example embodiments of the present invention enable the use of radarimages to examine (e.g., with the corresponding cones 112, 114 and 116)an area of uncertainty (AOU) 119 around the target object 108 in orderto enable generation of a relatively complete image of the AOU 119 andthe target object 108 therein. The vehicles 100, 102 and 104 may flyaround the target object 108, which may itself also be moving. Thus, theAOU 119 may be moving. Moreover, in some cases, as indicated above,coordination of the flight paths of the vehicles 100, 102 and 104 may beaccomplished via the communication links 118 to provide for control overthe formation and/or movement of the vehicles 100, 102 and 104 toimprove the quality and/or completeness of the images receivedtherefrom. As such, a relatively accurate composite 3D image of thetarget object 108 may be generated over time to enable identification ofthe target object 108.

The master vehicle (e.g., vehicle 100) may receive radar data from eachof the other vehicles and combine the received radar data with the radardata collected locally at the master vehicle in order to generate acomposite 3D image of the target object 108. In some embodiments, thecomposite 3D image may be a three dimensional image of the correspondingobject on the ground or on the water. The composite 3D image may, insome cases, also include data indicative of some internal features ofthe target object 108 in instances where sufficient power is able to beused to project the cones in a fashion that permits the transmittedwaves to penetrate (at least to some degree) the target object 108. Thecomposite 3D image (with or without data indicative of internalfeatures) may then be compared to a target library to determine anaccurate model and/or identity of the target object 108 as described ingreater detail below. Once the target object 108 has been identified (orits identity confirmed), aimpoint data may be generated and shared withthe other vehicles based on the class or identity of the target object108. The aimpoint data may then be used by the vehicles to guideprosecution of an attack on the target object 108 based onvulnerabilities of the target object 108 as determined by the identityor classification of the target object 108. This aimpoint data willdefine the most vulnerable point on the target.

Accordingly, example embodiments may provide for observation of a targetto be performed by a plurality of vehicles in which at least one of thevehicles is capable of guiding the observation and also performingtomographic reconstruction of a composite 3D image of the target usingdata received from the vehicles. The corresponding one of the vehiclesmay also be configured to identify the target based on the composite 3Dimage and share information determined based on the identity (e.g., thecomposite 3D image itself and/or aimpoint data for the identifiedtarget) with the other vehicles.

FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of hardware that may be employed onthe master vehicle or any vehicle that can function as the mastervehicle. It should be appreciated that, as indicated above, in someembodiments all vehicles have the capability of functioning as themaster vehicle. Thus, each vehicle may, in some embodiments, include thestructure described in FIG. 2.

As shown in FIG. 2, the vehicles 100, 102 and 104 may include a dataprocessing system 200 to process data received responsive to locallyreceived radar returns or return data received by other vehicles andgenerate the composite 3D image of an object. The data processing system200 may include a communication bus 202 or other communication fabric toprovide communication between the various components of the dataprocessing system 200. The data processing system 200 components mayinclude a processor 204, a memory 206, a communication unit 208 and aninput/output unit 210.

The processor 204 may be embodied in a number of different ways. Forexample, the processor 204 may be embodied as various processing meanssuch as a processing element, a coprocessor, a controller or variousother hardware processing devices including integrated circuits such as,for example, an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit), an FPGA(field programmable gate array), a hardware accelerator, or the like. Inan exemplary embodiment, the processor 204 may be configured to executeinstructions stored in a memory device (e.g., memory 206) or otherwiseaccessible to the processor 204. By executing stored instructions oroperating in accordance with hard coded instructions, the processor 204may control the operation of the data processing system 200 by directingfunctionality of the data processing system 200 associated withimplementing composite 3D image generation and target identificationdescribed herein according to the respective configuration provided tothe data processing system 200 by the processor 204 and/or theinstructions stored in memory 206 for configuring the processor 204. Assuch, whether configured by hardware or software methods, or by acombination thereof, the processor 204 may represent an entity capableof performing operations according to embodiments of the presentinvention while configured accordingly.

The memory 206 may include, for example, volatile and/or non-volatilememory. The memory 206 may be configured to store information,instructions and/or the like. For example, the memory 206 could beconfigured to buffer data for processing by the processor 204 or priorto transmission or responsive to reception. Additionally oralternatively, the memory 206 could be configured to store instructionsfor execution by the processor 204. The memory 206 may be an integratedpart of the data processing system 200 or may be a removable memorydevice.

In some embodiments, the communication unit 208 may include hardware,and in some cases also software for configuring the hardware, forenabling the data processing system 200 to interface with other devicesand users, if applicable. Thus, for example, if the data processingsystem 200 is embodied as the master vehicle, the data processing system200 may include circuitry and/or components to enable inter-deviceinterface (e.g., via the communication links 118). As such, thecommunication unit 208 may include wired and/or wireless interfacecircuitry such as an antenna (or antennas) and corresponding transmitand receive circuitry to enable wireless communication with otherdevices over a radio access technology.

In an example embodiment, the input/output unit 210 may provide forconnection to any other modules that may be used in connection with thedata processing system 200. Thus, for example, the input/output unit 210may provide for an interface with a radar system for generatingtransmissions and receiving and/or processing return data. Theinput/output unit 210 may also provide for any other interface neededwith other components to provide, receive, process, store, or otherwisemanipulate data that may be generated or used within the data processingsystem 200.

In an example embodiment, the processor 204 and/or the memory 206 maycomprise portions of processing circuitry configured to cause the dataprocessing system 200 to perform functionality according to theconfiguration either hardwired into the processor 204 or provided by theexecution of instructions stored in the memory 206. As such, the dataprocessing system 200 may be configured to control processes associatedwith composite 3D image reconstruction and target identification alongwith the provision of aimpoint data to other vehicles as describedherein. Thus, for example, the data processing system 200 may representan apparatus that may be configured (e.g., by execution of storedinstructions) to generate a composite three dimensional representationof a target based on radar data received at the apparatus from otheraerial vehicles generating projections over an area in which the targetis located (e.g., the AOU 119) and based on radar data generated by anaerial vehicle in which the apparatus is located. The apparatus may befurther configured to identify the target based on the composite threedimensional representation, and generate aimpoint data regarding thetarget based on an identity of the target. This aimpoint data willdefine the most vulnerable point on the target. In an exampleembodiment, the apparatus may include memory storing at least anupdateable target library indicating respective target parameters for aplurality of known potential targets. The processor 204 may be furtherconfigured to communicate the aimpoint data from the apparatus, actingas a master vehicle, to at least one of the other aerial vehicles actingas a slave vehicle. In some embodiments, identifying the target mayinclude comparing the composite three dimensional representation of thetarget to a plurality of known representations of targets in the targetlibrary to determine the identity of the target based on a degree ofmatching between the composite three dimensional representation and oneof the known representations. In some cases, generating aimpoint datamay include utilizing characteristics regarding vulnerable locationswithin the target based on the identity of the target to generatecoordinates for an aimpoint for attacking the target. In an exampleembodiment, the processor 204 may be further configured to shift theapparatus from a master vehicle status to a slave vehicle status therebycausing the apparatus to stop generating the composite three dimensionalrepresentation, identifying the target and generating the aimpoint dataand instead causing the apparatus to provide radar data generated by theaerial vehicle to one of the other aerial vehicles acting as a mastervehicle and receive aimpoint data from the master vehicle. In someembodiments, the processor 204 may be further configured to define atransit time by which the processor 204 is to identify the target andduring which the aerial vehicles collect radar data regarding the targetas described below.

In some embodiments, the processor 204 may be configured to control(e.g., via execution of corresponding instructions) various functionalcomponents used to define a processing unit 300 (see FIG. 3) that maycarry out example embodiments. However, in some cases, the processingunit 300 may actually be embodied by the processor 204 (e.g., byexecution of instructions for performing the corresponding functions ofthe processing unit 300). FIG. 3 illustrates various components of theprocessing unit 300 according to an example embodiment. The processingunit 300 may include a filter 302, a token maker 304, a token bank 306,a sinogram unit 308 and an optimization algorithm unit 310. The filter302 may be a local filter that filters radar data collected by theprocessing unit 300 before the radar data is processed by the processor204 for composite 3D image reconstruction, target identification and/oraimpoint data provision. As used herein a portion of the radar datacollected for an object by the processing unit 300 may be referred to asa projection. In an example embodiment, the filter 302 may receiveprojections 312 and store filtered projections 314 along with a token316 in a batch buffer 317 for communication to the master vehicle (orfor use locally for composite 3D image reconstruction and targetidentification along with the provision of aimpoint data when thevehicle employing the processing unit 300 is the master vehicle). Thedata stored in the batch buffer 317 may be communicated via thecommunication links 118 to the master vehicle or used locally if theprocessing unit 300 is associated with a vehicle acting as the mastervehicle.

The batch buffer 317 may be configured to store multiple tokens andassociated filter projections for transmission in batches. In somecases, the batch buffer 317 may provide for matching the data ratesbetween the communication links employed and generation of filteredprojections 314 by filter 302. The token maker 304 may generate tokens(e.g., token 316) that are grouped for batch communication to the mastervehicle. Generally speaking, a token may be generated by the token maker304 after the radar system completes one cycle of data collection thatis processed by the filter 302. A cycle may refer to the minimum amountof time needed to collect and process one portion of radar data or oneprojection including conditioning and filtering, as appropriate. Eachtoken may include an identification of the corresponding vehicle onwhich the processing unit 300 is located, a location of the vehicle(e.g., at the time the corresponding radar data is generated), a timestamp of when the radar data was generated, etc. Other information thatmay be included in the token may include sensor operating parameters orany other information that may be used to identify what portions of theradar data are provided (and therefore what other portions may be neededto produce a complete composite 3D image).

The sinogram unit 308 may be an example of a sampling unit that maydetermine what samples or portions of radar data are to be collected. Insome cases, the sinogram unit 308 may use tokens stored in the tokenbank 306 to generate a pictorial representation of samples in a samplingprocess for a three dimensional tomographic reconstruction process. Thesinogram unit 308 may be configured to identify different portions orprojections of radar data that have been collected by the processingunit 300 (and other processing units for the processing unit of themaster vehicle) based on the tokens. One or more sinograms 326 may bestored in the sinogram unit 308 based on the operation of the sinogramunit 308 as described herein.

The optimization algorithm unit 310 may be configured to receive thesinograms 326 and cue data 328 as inputs to generate controlinstructions 330. The cue data 328 may include information regarding thecurrent location of the object on which data is being collected (e.g.,from the master vehicle) and/or estimated feature data regarding theobject. The control instructions 330 may be used by the sinogram unit308 to update portions of the radar data collected for use inreconstructing the composite 3D image of the object and may includeinstructions for flight control and/or sensor control in some cases. Theflight control instructions may be used to direct the vehicle tolocations that may enable collection of data corresponding to missingportions of the radar data.

In an example embodiment, the processor 204 (of FIG. 2) may controloperation of the processing unit 300 for collection of radar data andmay then, in the master vehicle, use the radar data collected fromvarious different processing units of each of the vehicles to generate acomposite 3D image of the object (e.g., the target object 108). Thecomposite 3D image of the object may then be used to identify (orconfirm the identification of) the object based on comparison of thecomposite 3D image to known target data. In an example embodiment, thememory 206 may store a target library including image data for variousdifferent potential targets. In some cases, a publication such as Jane'sFighting Ships or other source may be used to provide data that can beused for comparison. As such, the processor 204 may be configured todetermine the class or type of target that the object corresponds toand, in some cases, even perhaps the hull number of certain distinctivetargets. The disclosure of commonly owned U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication No. 2008/0308670 to Meyer et al., which is incorporatedherein by reference, describes an example of the use of a target imagelibrary for comparing target image data to that of stored image data todetermine a specific target.

Example embodiments of the present disclosure may utilize theidentification of a specific target (e.g., target object 108) todetermine vulnerabilities of the corresponding target. As discussedabove, the location of the engine room, the control center, ammunitionstorage or other vulnerable areas on the target object 108 may bedetermined based on known information about the corresponding identifiedobject. This information may then be used to generate aimpoint data thatmay be provided from the master vehicle to other vehicles. In someexamples, the aimpoint data may include coordinate data such as globalpositioning system (GPS) coordinates that indicate the location of avulnerable location on the target object 108. As such, the aimpoint datamay identify a “sweet spot” for hitting the specific identified target.In some embodiments, the aimpoint data may be accompanied with orotherwise include the composite 3D image data as well.

In some example embodiments, the processor 204 may control operation ofa target classifier 230 configured to identify or classify targets basedon a comparison of the composite 3D image to known target data from atarget library 232 (e.g., stored in the memory 206). The identity orclassification of the target may then be used by an aimpoint generator234 to generate aimpoint data as described above. Since each vehicle maybe able to operate as the master, each vehicle may have a target library232 on board. However, in some embodiments, only the master vehicle mayactually employ the target library 232. The target library 232 may beupdateable via a software modification.

As indicated previously, in some cases each of the vehicles (e.g.,vehicles 100, 102 and 104) may have the capability of acting as a mastervehicle. The launch platform 106 may specifically identify one of thevehicles as the master vehicle in some cases. However, in other cases,other criteria may be used for selection of the master vehicle and insome cases that selection may be made automatically by the vehiclesthemselves and a vehicle determining that it is or should be the mastervehicle may announce to the other vehicles via the communication links118. Criteria such as order of launch (e.g., first or last launched),order of arrival on scene or acquisition of the target (e.g., first orlast to acquire contact with the target), processing or communicationcapability (e.g., if different vehicles are employed and have differingcapabilities), battery or power level, device state (e.g., normalcondition, interference level, damage status, etc.) and other factorsmay all be used to set specific conditions under which a particularvehicle may declare itself to be the master vehicle or relinquish mastervehicle status to a more qualified vehicle. For example, if a particularvehicle is first on scene and declares itself to be the master vehicleinitially, the particular vehicle may later transfer (or request anotherdevice to declare itself master) the master vehicle status to anothervehicle in response to the particular vehicle taking damage (or losingcommunication completely), or having a low battery level which mightlimit its processing capabilities.

In some embodiments, a transit time may be defined for the vehicles 100,102 and 104 to define the time that is allotted to collect data on theobject to build an image of the object. The transit time may beprogrammed into each of the vehicles at launch, or may be communicatedto the vehicles by the master vehicle. In some embodiments, the mastervehicle may process data received to generate the composite 3D image assoon as sufficient data is available to generate the image and make amatch to a corresponding image in the target library 232. However, ifsufficient data has not yet been received by the time the transit timeexpires, the master vehicle may process available data and estimate theidentity of the object based on the available data at the time ofexpiration of the transit time. Some embodiments may enable the mastervehicle to extend the transit time one or more times for predefinedintervals under certain conditions. However, some embodiments may definea maximum transit time (or minimum transit time) to ensure that a strikecan be initiated within certain predetermined parameters.

After the master vehicle provides aimpoint data to the vehicles, attackon the target object 108 may be authorized either by virtue of theaimpoint data being provided or by separate message providing suchauthorization. In some cases, one or more of the vehicles that have beenprovided with the aimpoint data (e.g., those vehicles that are missiles)may simply attack the target based on the aimpoint data. However, insome other examples, the vehicles may continue to generate radar data onthe target as they approach the target to further confirm (or evenmodify) the aimpoint data based on perceivable differences between theaimpoint data provided and the current position of the target (e.g., dueto evasive maneuvers or other factors that may change target location ororientation). In both cases, the aimpoint data will define the mostvulnerable point on the target.

FIG. 4 illustrates a process flow for operation of a master vehicleaccording to an example embodiment. As indicated at operation 400, themaster vehicle may establish communication with slave vehicles. Themaster vehicle may receive radar data corresponding to a target that iscollected by slave vehicles at operation 402. The master vehicle mayalso locally generate radar data corresponding to the target atoperation 404. At operation 406, the locally generated radar data andthe received radar data may be processed to generate a composite 3Dimage of the target. The composite 3D image of the target may be used toidentify the target at operation 408 after which time aimpoint data maybe generated based on the identity of the target at operation 410. Theaimpoint data may be provided to the slave vehicles at operation 412. Atoperation 414, the master vehicle and/or the slave vehicles may attackthe target based on the aimpoint data.

FIG. 5 illustrates a process flow for operation of a slave vehicleaccording to an example embodiment. At operation 500, the slave vehiclemay establish communication with the master vehicle. The slave vehiclemay transmit, to the master vehicle, radar data corresponding to atarget that is collected by the slave vehicle at operation 502. Theslave vehicle may monitor periodically for continued communication withthe master vehicle at operation 504. If communication is lost (or if aninstruction is received to switch to or assume master status), the slavevehicle may assume the role of master vehicle at operation 506 and shiftto operation according to FIG. 4. However, if communication ismaintained, the slave vehicle may continue to provide radar data to themaster vehicle until the transit time is reached or until aimpoint datais received from the master vehicle at operation 508. At operation 510,the slave vehicle may attack the target based on the aimpoint data. Thataimpoint data will define the most vulnerable point on the target.

Many modifications and other embodiments of the disclosure set forthherein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which theseembodiments pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in theforegoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is tobe understood that the disclosure is not to be limited to the specificembodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments areintended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a genericand descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.

That which is claimed:
 1. An apparatus comprising: memory storing at least a target library indicating respective target parameters for a target; and a processor configured by stored instructions to: generate a composite three-dimensional image of the target by combining first radar data received at the apparatus from a first aerial vehicle collecting projections over an area in which the target is located and second radar data collected by a second aerial vehicle in which the apparatus is located, the first and second aerial vehicles being different from a launch platform, the first radar data corresponding to a first image of a first view of the target, the second radar data corresponding to a second image of a second view of the target, identify the target based on the composite three-dimensional image, and generate aimpoint data regarding the target based on an identity of the target, the aimpoint data defining a vulnerable point on the target, wherein the processor is further to shift the apparatus from a master vehicle status to a slave vehicle status causing the apparatus to stop generating the composite three-dimensional image identifying the target and generating the aimpoint data, and instead causing the apparatus to provide radar data generated by the second aerial vehicle to the first aerial vehicle acting as a master vehicle and receive aimpoint data from the master vehicle.
 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first aerial vehicle or the second aerial vehicle is to attack the target based on the aimpoint data.
 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the target library is updateable.
 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is to communicate the aimpoint data between the apparatus, acting as the slave vehicle, and the first aerial vehicle acting as a the master vehicle.
 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is to identify the target by comparing the composite three-dimensional image of the target to a plurality of known representations of targets in the target library to determine the identity of the target based on a degree of matching between the composite three-dimensional image and one of the known representations.
 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is to generate aimpoint data by utilizing characteristics regarding vulnerable locations within the target based on the identity of the target to generate coordinates for an aimpoint for attacking the target.
 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is to define a transit time by which the processor is to identify the target and during which the aerial vehicles collect radar data regarding the target.
 8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first aerial vehicle or the second aerial vehicle comprises a missile.
 9. A system comprising aerial vehicles configured to generate radar data based on projections over an area in which a target is located, wherein a first aerial vehicle is to act as a master vehicle and a second aerial vehicle is to act as a slave vehicle, the first and second aerial vehicles being different than a launch platform, the slave vehicle to provide radar data collected by the slave vehicle to the master vehicle, and the master vehicle to: generate a composite three-dimensional image of the target based on first radar data received from the slave vehicle and second radar data collected by the master vehicle, the first radar data corresponding to a first image of the target, the second radar data corresponding to a second image of the target, identify the target based on the composite three-dimensional image, and generate aimpoint data regarding the target based on an identity of the target, the aimpoint data defining a vulnerable point on the target, wherein the master vehicle is to enable switching to a role of a slave vehicle or exit from an action and wherein the slave vehicle is to switch to a role of a master vehicle.
 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the launch platform is to launch a third vehicle, the third vehicle being different from the first and second aerial vehicles, the first and second aerial vehicles are to be associated with the launch platform, the third vehicle to receive the aimpoint data to attack the target.
 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the master vehicle is to communicate the aimpoint data to the slave vehicle or the third vehicle.
 12. The system of claim 9, wherein the master vehicle includes a target library indicating respective target parameters for a plurality of known potential targets.
 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the master vehicle is to identify the target by comparing the composite three-dimensional image of the target to a plurality of known representations of targets in the target library to determine the identity of the target based on a degree of matching between the composite three-dimensional image and one of the known representations.
 14. The system of claim 9, wherein the master vehicle is to generate aimpoint data by utilizing characteristics regarding vulnerable locations within the target based on the identity of the target to generate coordinates for an aim point for attacking the target.
 15. The system of claim 9, wherein the master vehicle is to define a transit time by which the master vehicle is to identify the target and during which the master vehicle and the slave vehicle collect radar data regarding the target.
 16. A method comprising: receiving, at a master aerial vehicle, first radar data corresponding to a first image of a target from a slave aerial vehicle in communication with the master vehicle, the master aerial vehicle and the slave aerial vehicle being different from a launch platform; generating a composite three-dimensional image of the target based on the first radar data received from the slave aerial vehicle and second radar data collected by the master aerial vehicle, the first radar data corresponding to a first image of the target, the second radar data corresponding to a second image of the target; identifying the target based on the composite three-dimensional image; generating aimpoint data regarding the target based on an identity of the target, the aimpoint data defining a vulnerable point on the target; and enabling the master aerial vehicle to switch to a role of a slave vehicle or exit from an action to enable the slave aerial vehicle to switch to a role of a master vehicle.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the master and slave aerial vehicles are to be associated with the launch platform; further comprising: communicating the aimpoint data to the slave aerial vehicle; and in response to the aimpoint data received, the slave aerial vehicle to attack the target.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the master aerial vehicle is to define a transit time by which the master aerial vehicle is to identify the target and during which the master aerial vehicle and the slave aerial vehicle collect radar data regarding the target.
 19. The method of claim 16, wherein identifying the target comprises comparing the composite three-dimensional image of the target to a plurality of known representations of targets in a target library to determine the identity of the target based on a degree of matching between the composite three-dimensional image and one of the known representations.
 20. The method of claim 16, wherein generating aimpoint data comprises utilizing characteristics regarding vulnerable locations within the target based on the identity of the target to generate coordinates for an aimpoint for attacking the target. 